So, it has happened again. And once again America will celebrate its macabre parade: the repeated images of grieving families and shocked onlookers; the headlines and special report segments across newspapers, TV, and cable; the questioning of â€œwhy?â€, â€œhow could this happen?â€, and the brazen attempts by news media â€“Â as well as legislators and politicians (is there a difference?) â€“ to convey grief but steer clear of taking a substantive stance on the presence of guns in our communities.
First, yes, again it was a male. And again those of us in the violence prevention movement decry for this culture to take serious stock of how we raise boys to be men. How we continue to keep boys boxed-in at a place where they think violence and aggression are the only acceptable means of emotional expression. That anything else makes them like women â€“ and we all know how bad THAT is; to take stock of misogyny and homophobia and the lengths we go to keep the gender divide in place by playing to menâ€™s fears of women, gay men and women, transgender and gender non-conforming people.
As if that wasnâ€™t bad enough, layered on top of it all is a culture immersed in an epidemic of gun violence. Some of the press coverage, and many of the comments on Facebook and Twitter, have brought mental illness into the picture â€“ and while I, too, believe that this individualâ€™s lack of ability to deal with his pain in any constructive way eventually led to his actions and the senseless deaths of he and 26 other human beings, I must admit I get weary of bringing the conversation to the level of mental illness. As if this, and all other incidents, are isolated actions played out by madmen.Â As if all those struggling with mental illness are mad, out of control, or resort to violence.
Owning guns is a mental illness; it is the collective mental illness that we, as a nation, are in the grip ofâ€¦
There is no reason â€“Â no reason â€“ to own a gun, except to contend with the â€œboogie manâ€ that resides in your own mind. Gun ownership is the tangible manifestation of a philosophy of life where conflict is resolved by asserting power over others, and where oneâ€™s own perspective and experience of reality is the only one. The owner of a gun asserts that because of something â€“ oneâ€™s race or national identity, or economic class, or the balance of wrongs that one has endured in life add-up to a sense of entitlement â€“ they are imbued with the right to be judge, and if circumstances warrant, jury and executioner.
How did it get to this point? How does the right to bear arms, written at a time when we were in a struggle with the British crown over sovereignty and control of our destiny, get turned into a manifesto for the rights of individual citizens to have access to weapons of mass destruction (and really, what do you call something with a 16 round clip)? We won that fight. We have a democracy where we get a say in what happens. We have avenues and pathways to address disparity, unfairness, oppression, and violations of the common law that we all swear allegiance to. We no longer need guns, really.
Except, of course, there are those that profit from their manufacture and sale, and therefore profit from the proliferation of a culture of fear and the concept that any problem you have can be kept at bay or wiped out. At the end of the barrel of a gun.